CITY OF EUREKA
SPRINGS
CITY COUNCIL
REGULAR MEETING MONDAY MARCH 28, 2005
Mayor Kathy Harrison called the regular meeting of the Eureka Springs City Council to order at 6 p.m. Monday, March 28, in the jury room of the Western District Carroll County Courthouse.
PRESENT: Mayor
Kathy Harrison, Aldermen Robert “Butch”
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
TO THE FLAG:
Mayor Harrison led the Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag.
APPROVAL OF THE
AGENDA:
Mr. Falotico moved to approve the agenda. Mr. Rojek seconded. All voted aye. Motion passed 6/0/0
APPROVAL OF THE
MINUTES: March 14, 2005
Ms. Blankenship moved to approve the minutes of March 14. Mr. Rojek seconded. Five voted aye. Mr. McClung voted nay. Motion passed 5/1/0
COMMISSION,
COMMITTEE, AUTHORITY REPORTS AND VACANCIES:
Planning Commission – Position 6 – Expires 1/1/06
Hospital Commission – Position 6 – Expires 9/7/05
Historic District Commission – Position 6 – Expires 3/7/05
Mayor Harrison said she has received two applications for re-instatement of members of the Parks and Recreation Commission.
DEPARTMENT AND
COMMISSION REPORTS:
CAPC, Hospital, Fire/EMS, Building and
Cemetery
CAPC – Ms.
Ms.
Blankenship asked about delinquent CAPC tax payers. Ms.
City Council 3/28/05
1
Hospital – Ms. Sell reported the hospital’s interim administrator, Craig Ortego, had scheduling conflicts and could not attend this meeting. He will attend the April 4 meeting and provide a report.
Mayor Harrison read aloud the report from the Fire/EMS Department.
Ms. Sell read the Building Official’s monthly report aloud. She said the Cemetery Commission is still working on employment issues.
Mr. Falotico asked that the January financial reports be available for the next meeting.
OLD BUSINESS:
1. Discussion of the Johnsons’
request to open
Mayor
Harrison said she has received letters from the Johnsons asking that Dr. Van
Brahana from the
She has walked the area with Charles Nickle, consulting engineer with USI. She introduced Terry Carpenter, vice-president of USI. He said he had looked at the area Friday, March 25, with three considerations: (1) what type of road is proposed and the impact on adjoining property; (2) effects on the downhill areas; and (3) the city’s responsibility.
Carpenter said the city has no obligation to construct a roadway for the sole purpose of access to one property, only those roads which are of mutual benefit to the city and citizens.
He said it will be very difficult without extensive, and expensive, underground testing to determine the impact of construction upstream and downstream of the roadbed.
He said a lot of trees will need to be removed which will make erosion a factor. Terraces or retaining walls will have to be constructed to keep the hillsides in place. The existing city ordinances do not allow for the protection of aquifers/springs and it could be very expensive to put measures in place, with no guarantee the protection would be enough.
He said the city would have to
construct some method of collecting the storm water from the hill. The water
could possibly go all the way to the bottom of the hill and flood
During questioning by Mr.
Mr. Weaver
said the city is not obligated to open the street. The city will have to pick a
street standard for construction. At the moment,
Mr.
Falotico moved to authorize Dr. Brahana’s study of the
City Council 3/28/05 2
Mr. McClung
said he doesn’t think (the opening of
Mr. Forrest asked the Council to keep in mind that he (Public Works) has to maintain the road. If it is gravel, the gravel will wash downhill every time it rains.
Ms. Blankenship said the construction of retaining walls could be cost prohibitive. Referring to Mr. Carpenter’s comments, she quoted him as saying the city should not build the roadway.
Mr.
Mr. Falotico then moved to accept Dr. Brahana was a person who will conduct an environmental impact study, pro bono, and will take into consideration the city’s minimum street standards, and the study is not binding either party into a contract. Ms. Blankenship seconded. All voted aye. Motion passed 6/0/0
NEW BUSINESS:
1.
Discussion
of parking lot use – citizen – Linda Rogers
(The parking lot under discussion
is on
Ms. Rogers said that allowing one person to use the parking spaces on the second most important shopping day of the week has been seriously detrimental to surrounding businesses. She believes there must be a better location for the market somewhere else in town. She said one parking space in that lot brings in $200-$300 per week. She said it takes $10,000 in sales tax on retail sales to recoup the parking money lost.
Mickey Schneider said the city is losing parking revenue, the vendors do not have city business licenses and are not collecting sales tax or CAPC tax.
Sara Knight, co-owner of Paper Odyssey at 63 N. Main, said
she had talked to several North Main business owners who were very happy with
the market because it brought more people into the
James DeVito, owner of DeVito’s Restaurant,
Lisa Knapp, owner of Sweet Memories, 53 Spring
Charlotte Buchanan, founder of
the Sunday Market, said the market is established in that
Ms. Blankenship said the Council
voted last year to allow the market to support the
City Council 3/28/05
3
Ms. Buchanan said she had tried to talk with parking officers and merchants in the area to get them to park out of downtown and be shuttled in for work.
Mr. Berry said he has heard from both sides of the issue. He said market vendors are the ones parking in the adjoining spaces, not visitors. He is concerned about vendors not paying the city sales tax and CAPC tax.
Ms. Blankenship said it is the law that vendors have state sales tax permits and a CAPC permit. Do the market vendors have the permits?
Mr. McClung said he wanted to go on record saying that he didn’t think the mayor should give permission for the use of the parking lot.
Mr. McClung moved at 8 p.m. to take a five minute break. Ms. Blankenship seconded. All voted aye. Motion passed 6/0/0
The meeting resumed at 8:15 p.m.
2.
Discussion
of Wall of Art – referred by HDC
(The Art Wall project is proposed by Charlotte Buchanan as 28 4-foot by 8-foot concrete panels mounted on the city’s concrete wall on First St., behind the parking lot between the Basin Spring Bath House building and the Greenlee Funeral Home building. The theme for the panels is fruits and vegetables. Local artists have agreed to participate in the project.)
Mr. Rojek moved to allow the art work to be placed on the cement wall on First St. Mr. Falotico seconded.
Ms. Weaver said she supported the project as long as there are no legal problems.
Mr. Rojek said the project sounds like fun, there will be beautiful panels and it will be exciting to have in the downtown area, no matter what is on the panels.
Mr.
Charlotte Buchanan said she had
talked with Mr. Forrest a year ago about the wall. She said the project is to
support local artists. Community First Bank has agreed to fund $2,500 to
purchase the blank panels and pay the artists. She said the wall could be part
of a connecting artery for the galleries on Spring St. to the ones on
Mr. Weaver said other cities have similar projects, but he is not sure how. He does not want the city to be perceived as sponsoring one group of artists over another.
Ms. Blankenship called for the question to halt discussion. Mr. Rojek seconded. Two voted aye.
Mr. Rojek moved to amend his original motion to say the panels do not have to go back to the HDC for approval. Mr. Falotico seconded. All voted aye on the amendment. 6/0/0
On the motion to allow the wall and the wall not to return to HDC, all voted aye. Motion passed 6/0/0
City Council 3/28/05 4
3. Discussion of Ordinance #1989, an ordinance to establish a Board
of Appeals for stone walls.
Mr. Falotico moved to place Ordinance 1989 on its first reading. Ms. Weaver seconded. All voted aye. Motion passed 6/0/0
Mayor Harrison read the ordinance aloud.
Mr. Falotico moved to approve Ordinance 1989 on its first reading. Ms. Weaver seconded.
During discussion, Mr. Falotico
moved to amend his motion to direct that a section be inserted into the
ordinance setting guidelines if there is a failure to notify applicants within
20 days and to change Sec. 2 to give applicants 20 days, not 10, to appeal a
decision of the Public Works director. Mr.
On the motion to approve the ordinance on its first reading, all voted aye. Motion passed 6/0/0
4. Discussion of Resolution #512 – a resolution requesting changes
to state legislation regarding the CAPC. McClung, Rojek
Mr. Rojek moved to discuss the resolution. Mr. McClung seconded.
Ms. Blankenship said she had talked with the Municipal League about the proposals and to attorneys. She said the attorneys are not sure the existing state statute which enables the Eureka Spring CAPC is legal. She said all of the state legislators would be looking at the changes and the Council members need to think about what will happen if the changes are made.
Ms.
Mr. McClung moved to approve Resolution #512. Mr. Rojek seconded. Four voted aye. Mr. Falotico and Ms. Weaver voted no. Motion passed 4/2/0
Mayor Harrison read Resolution #512 aloud.
5. Discussion of Ordinance #1990 – an ordinance to adopt the city
code book.
Mr. Falotico moved to place Ordinance 1990 on its first reading. Ms. Blankenship seconded. All voted aye. Motion passed 6/0/0
Ms. Sell read the ordinance aloud.
Mr. Falotico moved to approve Ordinance 1990 on its first reading. Mr. McClung seconded.
Mr.
Mr. Falotico moved to accept the first reading of Ordinance 1990 as amended. Mr. McClung seconded. All voted aye. Motion passed 6/0/0
City Council 3/28/05 5
6. Discussion of the structure of the
CAPC – Falotico, Blankenship.
Mr. Falotico moved to open discussion. Ms. Blankenship seconded.
Mr. Falotico said the operation of the CAPC needs to be examined. If the state statute is found to be special legislation, therefore illegal, the structure will have to be changed. He believes something different is needed and the people should decide what it is.
Mr. McClung said that the CAPC has been operating the same way for years and if it was going to be tested, it would have been done.
Ms. Blankenship said it is not lawful for a store excluded from collecting the (2 percent gross sales) tax to voluntarily collect the tax. According to the Municipal League, it is a bigger no no for the CAPC to accept the voluntarily collected tax.
As discussion continued, Mr. McClung asked Mr. Falotico why he thought the city is in jeopardy. Mr. Falotico said people have said they will sue the city over the collection of the tax.
CAPC Commissioner Steve Roberson asked the Council for more specific direction. He said if the state legislation is changed, it is up to the Council to make local changes, not the Commission.
Ms. Blankenship said she wants the Commission to look at the collection levels and to see what might be needed if the collection level is dropped or a ½ cent sales tax is added.
Roberson said if the gift shop category is removed, that will take away approximately 30 percent of current collections. It would mean lodging and restaurants would have to collect at least 50 percent more or the tax level on them would have to go to 3 percent to remain at the current amount of collections.
Discussion on this issue went on for 50 minutes without motions or actions taken.
7. Discussion of Ordinance #1114 – an ordinance providing for
emergency council meetings – changing notification procedures.
Due to the lateness of the hour, Mr. Rojek asked that the discussion be postponed to the next meeting. All agreed.
8. Discussion of capital expenditures – Council
Mr. Falotico moved to approve the capital expenditures budget of $820,013 as determined in the Thursday, March 24, workshop. Ms. Weaver seconded. All voted aye. Motion passed 6/0/0
CITY COUNCIL
COMMENTS:
Ms. Blankenship said the more research she has done on the CAPC ordinance issue, the more questions she has. She said the Municipal Code requires all business owners to have current business licenses. The deadline for renewal was Feb. 14 and a 10 percent penalty is now being charged. People who have not renewed their licenses need to do so.
Mr.
Falotico said he wants the city financials for January, February and March
presented at the next meeting and wants monthly financial reports at the first
of each month. Mr.
City Council 3/28/05
6
they were prepared for the second meeting of each month.
Mr.
Falotico amended his motion to have monthly financial reports at the second
meeting of each month. Mr.
Mr. Falotico said he wanted to clear up rumors in the community. He and his wife are expecting their first child.
MAYOR’S COMMENTS:
Mayor Harrison said she had provided written information to the Council on bids awarded during March.
ADJOURNMENT:
Mr. McClung moved to adjourn at 9:50 p.m. Mr. Falotico seconded. All voted aye. Motion passed 6/0/0
This is the signature page for the minutes of the regular City Council meeting March 28, 2005.
________________________________
Mayor Kathy Harrison
________________________________
City Clerk Mary Jean Sell
City
Council 3/28/05 7